Gaston and His Favourite Toy

Mozart Clarinet Concerto

 

Faun

Ghats

YouTube Speed

Prince or King Charlie, and the Loddon or Jajoweroung Tribe, Boort Creek 16 Nov 1863

Margot Fonteyn, Rudolph Nureyev - 'Romeo and Juliet' Autographs

Vaslav Nijinsky - ‘Danse Siamoise' from the suite of dances 'Les Orientales’

'Les Orientales’ was a suite of dances devised for the 1910 Paris season of the Ballets Russes, replacing ‘Le Festin’ of the previous season. The theme of the suite was inspired by a visit of Siamese court dancers to St Petersburg in the 1890’s, fitting with the ‘exotic’ strand of a number of the ballets in the repertoire of the company at this time.

'Les Orientales’ premiered on 25th of June 1910 at the Théâtre National de l'Opéra, Paris.

Nijinsky appeared in two dances in the suite: ‘Danse Siamoise’ (Music by Christian Sinding [Rondoletto giocoso, op.32/5, orch. Igor Stravinsky]) and ‘Variation’ (Music by Edvard Grieg [Småtroll, op.71/3, from Lyric Pieces, Book X, orch. Igor Stravinsky]).

There is disagreement between Boris Kochno (‘Diaghilev and the Ballets Russes’) and Lincoln Kirstein (‘Nijinsky Dancing’) about the creators of the choreography, and the costume and set designs for ‘Danse Siamoise’.

Kochno states Nijinsky created the choreography for both the ballets he appeared in, and Kirstein that ‘Danse Siamoise’ was from Mikhail Fokine. The Michail Fokine Estate does not list the ballet in Fokine’s oeuvre, but this maybe be due to the work being considered inconsequential. There seems no dispute that the choreography for ‘Variation’ was the work of Nijinsky, being his first effort in this new direction.

As far as costume and set designs go, Kochno claims they are by Constantine Korovine (or Korovin) and Kirstein, by Léon Bakst. I suspect that Kochno may be referring to designs of another/other ballets in the suite as he is not specific to ‘Danse Siamoise’. And the extraordinary power of the invention of these exotic designs shouts Bakst to me!

The first four further photographs of the ballet I’m posting here are by Eugène Druet. They were taken in the Passy garden of artist Jacques-Émile Blanche to use when painting Nijinsky in this ballet. Images 1-3, while posed as are the studio images, have the quality of action photographs. 4 is an action photograph proper. As a set we have I think a tiny sense of Nijinsky in movement.

The next two images are sketches by Blanche for the final painting and the last, the rich glittering painting itself - replete with oriental carpet and gilded Chinese screens. A feast for the eyes!

Curiously, though, Jacques-Émile Blanche’s (Western European) idea of oriental exoticism is a quite contained tame affair compared with that of central Ballets Russes designer, Léon Bakst!

The World’s Oldest Surviving Dress - Egypt, 3,482 BC

I read:

“The world’s oldest dress dates back to around 3,482 BC, a new study has revealed. The “Tarkhan Dress”, which now looks more like a stained and tattered shirt, has been identified as Egypt’s oldest garment as well as the oldest surviving piece of woven clothing in the entire world.

Despite its current decrepit state, the “Tarkhan Dress”, the researchers point out, was once a fashionable linen garment, featuring knife-pleated sleeves and bodice with a naturally-beautiful pale grey stripped design. The lower part of the dress is missing, which is why its original length is currently unknown. 

Speaking about the find, recently published in the Antiquity journal, Alice Stevenson of the University College London said: The survival of highly perishable textiles in the archaeological record is exceptional, the survival of complete, or almost complete, articles of clothing like the Tarkhan Dress is even more remarkable. We’ve always suspected that the dress dated from the First Dynasty, but haven’t been able to confirm this as the sample previously needed for testing would have caused too much damage to the dress.”

Photographs of Vincent van Gogh

Until recently, the only accepted photographs of the Dutch master Vincent van Gogh (30 March 1853 – 29 July 1890) were two taken of the artist in his youth - at the ages of thirteen and nineteen respectively. 

More of these images in a moment.

Serge Plantureux, writer for the French magazine ‘L’Oeil de la Photographie’, believes that an 1887 photograph bought at an estate sale may well be an image of van Gogh as an adult.

The photograph (above) shows the painter (third from the left, pipe in hand) and group of friends including Paul Gauguin, Emile Bernard, Félix Jobbé-Duval, and André Antoine. It is a melanotype, where a positive picture is produced with sensitised collodion on a smooth surface of black varnish, coating a thin plate of iron.

This newly discovered 1887 photograph was sold at auction on 19th June, 2015 in Brussels for an undisclosed figure, with pre-sale estimates being between €120,000 and €150,000 (~$136,000 to $170,000).

The Seton Gallery in New Haven has displayed what they believe to be another and second image of the mature van Gogh, an 1886 cabinet photograph bought by artist Tom Stanford in a Massachusetts antique dealer’s shop in the early 1990s for one dollar. 

Stanford said “I saw it and thought it was van Gogh right away, and the more I looked at it, the more I was sure”.

The Van Gogh museum in Amsterdam disputes that this is an image of the artist (perhaps for the obvious reasons), though Albert Harper, director of the Henry Lee Institute of Forensic Science at the University of New Haven, believes otherwise.

Joseph Buberger, who has identified images of Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses Grant, judged the imagine genuine, comparing it with a self-portrait sketch.

Albert Harper said "Even the most minute detail matched up, even the smallest hairs on the beards matched up”. This might suggest that the artist made the self-portrait from the photograph.

As circumstantial evidence, van Gogh is known to have spent much time in Brussels, where Victor Morin, whose name is inscribed on the 1886 image, had his photographic studio.

Now returning to the accepted two youthful images mentioned at the beginning. Mr Buberger claims that they are in fact of the artist’s brother Theo, as they do not match any of Van Gogh's self-portraits, thus taking these 1866 and 1873 images out of the authentication by comparison equation.

As an unhelpful but interesting footnote, there is another 1886 photograph supposedly showing van Gogh and his friend, Emile Bernard, at a table beside the Seine at the Paris suburb of Asnieres.

What you think of all these images, having seen as we all probably have numbers of self-portraits by Vincent van Gogh?